Inane Review #2
I thought for today’s inane review I’d review last week’s inane review.
Right from the outset there’s a definite sense that this particular review was of a somewhat rushed and hastily slung together nature, almost as if the reviewer knew that he had to get something up on-line but his heart just wasn’t in it at that particular moment. There’s no depth of analysis (unlike the first inane review, which was thoroughly in-depth), and there’s not even an accompanying picture, which is most disappointing.
On the plus side what little information is given about the review subject (in this case a fire drill) is up to date and correct, and to provide some much needed context, times and staff numbers are stated as well .
The review is pretty nicely presented, using a clean, non-serif font, and ably formatted using the WordPress blogging platform. The title of the post is a large, bold font, and the subtitle in a smaller (but also bold) font. As mentioned above, the lack of a photo is a bit of a glaring omission, and would really have helped break up the story a little.
All told, this was a pretty shoddy effort throughout, and if this is indicative of the quality we can expect from future inane reviews, then it really does beg the question – why continue with them? Obviously a truly inane review requires that at the very least SOME time and effort be poured into it’s creation. Maybe it’s a mis-step on the way – after all, this is only the second review, and the entire feature is still finding it’s feet.